Over the last few years I've seen numerous things photographic that were said, here and elsewhere, to not be possible.
I don't understand a lot of the techno-jargon, but I do believe my eyes and experiences. Recently Rob Studdert provided a pointer to a page that explained some of what we are discussing. I read one of the articles, and I'm still not sure if the article supported or contradicted the position that digi can have a wide range of latitude. My photographic philosophy is simple: I point, I shoot, I process, and I look at the results. Shel > [Original Message] > From: William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > From: "Shel Belinkoff" > > I just know what I've seen and what the > > experts have shown and told me. > > Shel, what we actually see on paper is not germaine unless we can > come up with the correct technocrap to back it up. > Real life don't mean anything. > Theory, not reality, is where it's at nowadays. > > William Robb
