no it's not a really higher number being represented in binary just
because there are more
bits. There is a SCALING factor being used.
Assume a sensor pixel puts out 5VDC at clipping the A/D
full scale input level is 5VDC volts. So pure
white with 12 bit output is FFF and 8 bit
output is FF but they are both representing 
SAME quantity being measured ( 5VDC & pure white light) not a higher
number.

By saying it the way you did it infers that
12 bit output A/Ds are recording higher sensor signal/light
levels than 8 bit ones do and they don't. The 12 bits
is SCALED DOWNWARD.....

JCO

-----Original Message-----
From: Herb Chong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2004 11:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: USAF target and resolution tests


who said that was an advantage or a disadvantage? is the maximum number
represented in 12 bits higher than 8 bits or not?

Herb...
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2004 11:08 AM
Subject: RE: USAF target and resolution tests


> I am not talking floating point. digital
> camera sensors have same output voltages
> feeding 12 bit output A/Ds as they feeding
> 8 bit output A/Ds. There is SCALING involved
> and the the advantage in using 12 bit vs. 8 bit is NOT
> a higher recorded signal level, it is
> finer gray scale and smaller step size.


Reply via email to