Frantisek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> I have given up on using the istD with TTL flash.
> >> >> It is totally useless in this regard.
>
> Out of curiosity, even with the P-TTL (preflash) ?
>
> I found that preflash TTL does decent results with digital,
and I saw
> some nice ones from Gianfranco's new 360FGZ (just few frames
when you
> bought the flash here, how is it working for you, Gianfranco?)
Hi Frantisek,
I'm not experiencing any problem with the FGZ, either in normal
or in wireless mode. I can say that I'm quite happy with the
combo, and really don't understand how comes that so many people
here have problems. Well, sometimes I had overexposure with the
AF400FTZ in some situation, but I shoot an entire wedding with
it and it was enough to put a -1,5 compensation for all the
shots...
I can post you few recent pictures taken with the 360FGZ, so you
can see by yourself the performance.
> Only gripe I have with pre-flash is that (especially if using
a
> wireless i-TTL or perhaps also the P-TTL wirelessly) there is
a not
> insignificant lag needed for the flashes to communicate. It
can be a
> nuisance if shooting fast people or something.
Yup, I too find that annoying. I prefer the normal TTL to avoid
the too often closed eyes of the subjects...
Ciao,
Gianfranco
=====
_
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page.
www.yahoo.com
