Shel, my experience with the *istD has been very problem-free. On one occasion I was getting weird results, but found that one of my grand-daughters, who had been insisting on holding Papa's camera, had nudged the dial off 'P' and on to 'M' without my realising. Other than that and the flash compensation problem I mentioned the other day (and I think I've nailed that to having Sensitivity Correction on), the camera has performed perfectly and reliably with all my lenses.
It has to be recognised that digital is different, for many it will always be a supplementary method of creating pictures, but I believe it is mature enough, and the *istD reliable enough and good enough, to justify taking it up. It certainly is a well-made camera: Ryan made the switch to Canon because he had focussing problems with a Sigma lens, not because the *istD was otherwise unsatisfactory. Many of the other issues that people have had sound to me like typical software and electronics problems which are easily (and very quickly) fixed by resetting the camera.


HTH

John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
----- Original Message ----- From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2004 2:12 AM
Subject: Concerns About Moving to Digital (Quality of istD)



I have some concerns about moving to digital, not as a replacement for film
but as a supplemental system.  Having been reading many digi-threads here,
one thing keeps popping up: the various problems people have been having
with the istD.  The idea of buying a camera and then working through
software and quality control issues, problems of all sorts, downloading
glitches, memory cards that fail, just seems to defeat the purpose of a
camera and lessen the experience of photography for me.  I'm not
particularly interested in solving "computer" problems when out making
photographs, and have never really had many problems in all the years I've
been shooting film: One battery problem with an ME Super, a sticky shutter
release on an MX (solved by whapping the camera against the palm of my
hand), and an LX with sticky mirror.  Apart from a friend dropping one of
my Leicas and needing to replace the rangefinder unit, those are the only
problems I've encountered since 1968 .... oh, my original Spotmatic had to
have the meter calibrated.

Are these problems typical of the Pentax dslr, or are there just a few
people here with such problems who post a lot looking for help in resolving
these issues. From what I gather most of the regulars here are using an
istD. How many have had NO problems with their cameras, software, memory
cards, or what have you? Who has had serious problems, where the cameras
has had to go in for repair, or be replaced, within a year or less after
purchase? Who has had a problem, regardless of what it was, that caused a
loss of images, or prevented a shooting session from being completed?


I've had my little Sony for 18 months or so, maybe more, and have not had a
single glitch with it. I just put in a card, make sure the battery has
juice, and point and shoot merrily all day long. Can that be expected from
the Pentax istD?


Shel






Reply via email to