Re: OT: Optimized Windows XP Digital Imaging system

[Graywolf]

Actually my middle-of-the-road system build 4 years ago is still adequate. A 
long way from state-of-the-art, but still adequate. I have been thinking that it 
is about time to upgrade again and build a current middle-of-the-road system. By 
the way, unless your system is an up to date quad-processor workstation it was 
not "top of the spectrum" even when you bought it.

Interestingly enough, in the past, I had to build a new system every couple of 
years because not only was my old system inadequate. It would not even run 
current software. We seem to have reach a point now where upgrading is nice 
treat rather an absolute necessity.

graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
-----------------------------------

Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Thanks for posting that.  I'm sure it will be helpful for many people.  How
disheartening it was to learn that my top of the spectrum system, purchased
only a few months ago, is now considered just "adequate."  <LOL>
Shel 


[Original Message]
From: Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 11/16/2004 12:54:22 PM
Subject: OT: Optimized  Windows XP Digital Imaging system 

For those interested in an optimized system (I'm looking), I ran across
this
article from Tim Grey. He's one of the instructors  @ Geo Lepp' s Digital
workshops. Tim is a very knowledgeable digital imaging guru.

http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/using/digitalphotography/expert/optimized
system.mspx
Kenneth Waller