> On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:49:03 +1300, David Mann wrote: > I agree. My FA* 300/4.5 is maybe even a bit sharper than the FA* > 200/2.8. I haven't tested it; it's more of a feeling. The scenes just > sort of jump out of the viewfinder at me.
Makes one wonder how the FA* 300/4.5 compares to the FA* 300/2.8. Makes me wonder a lot if I want the 2.8 or the 4.5 lens, comparing the prices. Sam
