I certainly can't argue against that position, and it does make some sense to me. If that's the case, then digi looks a little better. While I know it's a bit of a stretch and probably not the best comparison, would you say that RAW provides results like PS Shadows/Highlights while TIFF and JPEG are more like Levels?
Shel > [Original Message] > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 11/23/2004 7:45:19 AM > Subject: Re: *ist DS versus *ist D for the "Digital Newbie" > > I think that may be the case if you shoot jpegs or tiffs in a dslr. > However, when shooting RAW you have more control over > the shadows and highlights in conversion. > > > Hmmm ... seems that there are/were a lot of people claiming that a DSLR > > generally falls into the range of slide film, which is a couple of stops or > > so less than color negative film. Has that changed recently?
