Thanks, Simon. No, it's not mine. A pizza-shawarma place near by has an aquarium. I shot the fish while a was waiting for my durum roll :-)
Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Simon King [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 23. november 2004 08:44 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: RE: *istD & low light Thanks for the feedback guys. It surprises me that nobody has taken shots longer 30 seconds - I guess I'll have to try it out when I get my DSLR. Jens - I love the fish, is it yours? Larry - Thanks for the samples and examples. My 3yo's not up to team sport yet, but it's good to know you can get actions shots in such poor light Rob - Thanks for your comments. All this experience I've now got on calculating the reciprocity failure correction I have to make with film is will be history. Cheers, Simon -----Original Message----- From: Jens Bladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 23 November 2004 2:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: *istD & low light I had no problems in low light. Never tried very long exposueres. In low light the overall dynamics are never the same as in a well lit scenery, so I guess the dynammics are not as good in any photographs - no matter if it's film or CCD. This was shjot in very low light with a FA 1.4/50mm: http://gallery46369.fotopic.net/p7305076.html The colours were quite pale, but after changing the Levels in PS, and it was fine. I have made night shots (townscape) as well and had no problems. Of course there's more noice. Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Simon King [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 22. november 2004 02:00 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: *istD & low light Hi All, I'm wondering what experiences people have had shooting, specifically with the *istD, in low light around the 4-7 EV range. I'm interested in how it effects the capture on the sensor, not focusing. Does the dynamic range stay the same? Are there other problems that come up? Is it better than film at an equivalent ISO? Also, has anyone experimented with long exposures of over a minute? Sorry if these questions have come up before, and thanks in advance for replies. Cheers, Simon
