I agree with Graywolf's post. It simply doesn't make sense to enlarge both
images so that the magnifications are equivalent. If that were the case,
then one could use the same lens on 35mm and 4x5 film and then claim that
there is no difference between the two. The same comparison could also be
made for full-frame vs. APS-sized digital sensors and find no difference
between them. I do not think that this was a useful test. For a useful
test, the FINAL image size should be the same. If the methods of this test
were valid, I could use the same reasoning to suggest that we should all be
using APS or 110 SLR's rather than 35mm (or any larger format for that
matter.
Melchi M. Michel
mmichel[at]cvs[dot]rochester[dot]edu
W: 585-275-0523
H: 585-273-5859
Center for Visual Science &
Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
University of Rochester
CPU Box 273101, Rochester NY 14627-3101
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
