LOL, love 'em! Don
> -----Original Message----- > From: Rob Studdert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 8:42 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Was it really worth that much? > > > On 17 Dec 2004 at 1:24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > For candid portraits I prefer something longer than 135. Even > with an 85, you're > > only a half dozen feet away or so. With a e00, you can hide around the > > corner:-). Paul > > Yes, even my AF200/2.8 with a 1.7 tc is too short on occasion :-P > > http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio/temp/IMGP8901.jpg > > And sometimes the 77LTD is just way too long: > > http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio/temp/IMGP9293.jpg > > > Rob Studdert > HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA > Tel +61-2-9554-4110 > UTC(GMT) +10 Hours > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ > Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 >
