--- Frantisek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe it's the aspherical element - IIRC the mass-produced aspherics > were molded plastic on top of glass element (because all-glass aspherics > are so damn expensive, think Leica ASPH). So perhaps it's the bond > between the two that's deteriorating optically, while if so, they > would have certainly used some very special method of bonding them > together... or not?
That would be weird because FA*24/2 has molded plastic AL too, but doesn't seem to have any aging issue thus far. The only Pentax with glass AL seems to be the original K15/3.5, and the FA31/1.8. ===== Alan Chan http://www.pbase.com/wlachan __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Send holiday email and support a worthy cause. Do good. http://celebrity.mail.yahoo.com From jeff Mon Dec 13 10:46:34 2004 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-Date: Mon Dec 13 02:46:34 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: [email protected] Delivery-date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 02:46:34 -0800 Received: from exprod5mx22.postini.com ([64.18.0.137] helo=psmtp.com) by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Cdnis-0002I0-00 for <[email protected]>; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 02:46:34 -0800 Received: from source ([17.254.13.38]) (using TLSv1) by exprod5mx22.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 02:49:10 PST Received: from lists.apple.com (a17-128-113-151.apple.com [17.128.113.151]) by bz3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iBDAtO9F011758 for <[email protected]>; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 02:55:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from master.lists.apple.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB95C3BEA4CE for <[email protected]>; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 02:49:10 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from relay4.apple.com (relay4.apple.com [17.128.113.34]) by lists.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B22803BEA2B9 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 02:48:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from eg-mail-in1.apple.com (eg-mail-in1.apple.com [17.112.144.123]) by relay4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iBDAmsKm025727 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 02:48:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from transeo.com (mail.transeo.com [195.134.160.240]) by eg-mail-in1.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iBDAmpTW017798 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 02:48:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.74] (195.134.162.14) by transeo.com with ESMTP (Eudora Internet Mail Server 3.2.5) for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 11:48:47 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: XCode Users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: stephane sudre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 11:47:03 +0100 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) Cc: Subject: Dynamic Library being not very dynamic? X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Community supported Xcode help list <xcode-users.lists.apple.com> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/xcode-users>, <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/xcode-users>, <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 ) X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.0150) gt3 GT2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 I'm using libcrypto in a project. To use it, I added -lcrypto. The project is built on Mac OS X 10.3. The issue I'm seeing is that it looks like the dynamic behavior is lost. When I run the project on 10.3, no problem. When it's run on Mac OS X 10.2.8, it crashes because it's trying to load against libcrypto.0.9.7 which is not available on Mac OS X 10.2.8. What's the appropriate way to link against a dynamic library so that it stays dynamic? _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Xcode-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/xcode-users/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected] From jeff Mon Dec 13 10:46:45 2004 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-Date: Mon Dec 13 02:46:45 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: [email protected] Delivery-date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 02:46:45 -0800 Received: from exprod5mx23.postini.com ([64.18.0.138] helo=psmtp.com) by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Cdnj3-0002IK-00 for <[email protected]>; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 02:46:45 -0800 Received: from source ([209.239.33.40]) by exprod5mx23.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 05:49:21 EST Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by host24.websitesource.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) id iBD9GfFG011597 for [email protected]; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 04:16:41 -0500 Resent-Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 04:16:26 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: host24.websitesource.com: dbrewer set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f From: "Andy Chang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Finally, I scored a K35/2 !!! Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 17:16:21 +0800 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Importance: Normal Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailing-List: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archive/latest/134464 X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Precedence: list Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 ) X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.2 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,PLING_PLING autolearn=no version=2.64 So Peter... what lenses do you want to get rid of?...<vbg> Andy -----Original Message----- From: Peter J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 4:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Finally, I scored a K35/2 !!! Go ahead, ask away. I've got a few lenses I'd like to get rid of but I've been very lazy about getting them to e-bay. Gateway wrote: >Is buying and selling allowed here? Sorry, not trying to be snotty (although >that comes quite naturally) but there a re a couple of lenses I've been >looking for and was afraid to post here for fear of incurring the wrath of >the posters. > >Gareth > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2004 8:27 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Finally, I scored a K35/2 !!! > > >I wouldn't have taken a penny less than 130.00 .... feel better? Sorry we >missed connections on that, I'd have loved to have sold it to you. >Regardless, you're gonna like the lens. > >Shel > > > > >>[Original Message] >>From: Don Sanderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> > > > >>I'm pretty sure I did Shel, I've been looking for a while. >>Oh well, just tell me you wanted over $128.99 and make me >>feel good. ;-) >> >>Don >> >> >> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2004 6:21 PM >>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>Subject: RE: Finally, I scored a K35/2 !!! >>> >>> >>>Gee, did you post here that you were looking for one? I've a couple and >>>have been wanting to sell one for quite some time, but never got around >>> >>> >to > > >>>it. In any case, you're gonna like the lens. "tis a bit big, but it's >>>quite nice ... ;-)) >>> >>>Shel >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>[Original Message] >>>>From: Don Sanderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>To: PDML <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>Date: 12/12/2004 4:13:21 PM >>>>Subject: Finally, I scored a K35/2 !!! >>>> >>>>It's taken nearly a year but I finally got the >>>>one lens that's eluded me. >>>>A gen-yoo-wine SMCP 35/2! >>>>If it's 1/2 as good as everyone says it is >>>>my D now has a 'normal" lens. >>>>I like the K 35/3.5 a lot but it's a bit slow. >>>>52 equiv. at f:2, yeah! >>>> >>>>Don >>>> >>>> >>> >>> > > > > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. >Version: 7.0.296 / Virus Database: 265.5.0 - Release Date: 12/9/2004 > >-- >No virus found in this outgoing message. >Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. >Version: 7.0.296 / Virus Database: 265.5.0 - Release Date: 12/9/2004 > > > > -- I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war. During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings and shoot foreigners - two things that are usually frowned on during peacetime. --P.J. O'Rourke
