Breath slowly and deeply. For a few minutes.
Then carefully compose an email that explains the situation and send it to them. They will either say they understand and will await your return home, or "screw you". In either case you don't have to worry about it any longer.
What ever happens you can always brag that your work was up to the constests standards.
graywolf http://www.graywolfphoto.com "Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof" -----------------------------------
Ryan Lee wrote:
Whatever shall I do!!
From jeff Wed Dec 15 01:23:06 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 17:23:06 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:23:06 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx127.postini.com ([64.18.0.41] helo=psmtp.com)
by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CeNsg-00055L-00
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:23:06 -0800
Received: from source ([209.239.33.40]) by exprod5mx127.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:25:46 PST
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by host24.websitesource.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) id iBF0eXpq026368
for [email protected]; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 19:40:33 -0500
Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 19:38:39 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: host24.websitesource.com: dbrewer set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 00:40:42 +0000
From: Bob W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v2.10.03) Personal
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PESO: In the Art Gallery, Too
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailing-List: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archive/latest/134840
X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64
Hi,
Yes, Henry Moore indeed.
Bob's first, but I doubt he'll be at GFM, so he doesn't win a beer.
if I change my name to Mohammed, will the mountain come to me?
-- Cheers, Bob
"More than any time in history mankind faces a crossroads. One path leads to despair and utter hopelessness, the other to total extinction. Let us pray that we have the wisdom to choose correctly."
Woody Allen
From jeff Wed Dec 15 01:23:15 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 17:23:15 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:23:15 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx2.postini.com ([64.18.0.142] helo=psmtp.com)
by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CeNsp-00055W-00
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:23:15 -0800
Received: from source ([209.237.227.199]) by exprod5mx2.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 18:25:55 MST
Received: (qmail 41606 invoked by uid 500); 15 Dec 2004 01:19:15 -0000
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Id: "Slide Developers Mailing List" <slide-dev.jakarta.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Slide Developers Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 41587 invoked by uid 99); 15 Dec 2004 01:19:15 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
tests=RCVD_BY_IP,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of [EMAIL PROTECTED] designates 64.233.184.193 as permitted sender)
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (HELO wproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.184.193)
by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:19:12 -0800
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 67so21430wri
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:19:10 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references;
b=qEwJj6XGaYtXvgkHk0oFHoRJRhVXH/FF/bYt0YQgKftH82c9PmDTADwR/X9VH1OnhqaqnBpQacAubpNtQtyD4NMnaa0ww5pCHb8lJW/Wkk4+TFMO2XSPq2TiD26fkYvDBwq2Cx51sRGFkvWvvE2nIUzN8d1d2Ogxaany0ihv1FQ=
Received: by 10.54.27.79 with SMTP id a79mr2837716wra;
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:19:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.54.11.53 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:19:09 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 02:19:09 +0100
From: Oliver Zeigermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Slide Developers Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: New feature for internally repeating conflicting requests
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Checked: Checked
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.0750) GT3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:25:03 -0800, Warwick Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In AbstractWebdavMethod.java where you implemented the code to retry upon conflict you have a condition that there not be an external transaction in progress. Is this necessary as I'd like Slide to retry upon conflict even when the transaction was started by the client. I can't think of a reason why it would not work and catching this error condition client-side consumes more execution time since a new http request would need to be formulated for each retry.
You need to know what to repeat. The server has no idea what the client has done in an external transaction. No chance...
I was going to try it all out this way in my source tree and then submit it back to 2.1.
-1
Retrying of transactions is a complex new feature that must not go into a bug fix release. The place for this feature is CVS head and then 2.2.
Oliver
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From jeff Wed Dec 15 01:23:18 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 17:23:18 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:23:18 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx2.postini.com ([64.18.0.142] helo=psmtp.com)
by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CeNss-00055f-00
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:23:18 -0800
Received: from source ([146.82.138.6]) by exprod5mx2.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 18:25:58 MST
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by murphy.debian.org (Postfix) with QMQP
id 69B4D2E8FB; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 19:25:55 -0600 (CST)
Old-Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mailout05.sul.t-online.com (mailout05.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.82])
by murphy.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B1D02E19F
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 19:25:54 -0600 (CST)
Received: from fwd08.aul.t-online.de by mailout05.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1CeNvM-0008R3-01; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 02:25:52 +0100
Received: from SE-Home.vollstreckernet.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by fmrl08.sul.t-online.com
with esmtp id 1CeNvH-0wyzQ00; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 02:25:47 +0100
Received: from werner1.vollstreckernet.de (Werner1.vollstreckernet.de [192.168.1.2])
by SE-Home.vollstreckernet.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9231A3AAA6
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 02:25:32 +0100 (CET)
From: Werner Mahr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Telekom-Rechnung 2
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 02:17:35 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
micalg=pgp-sha1;
boundary="Boundary-02=_zC5vBntaCe0E5Zg";
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-TOI-MSGID: 41640786-d27b-4a16-8e00-cdea52a7e314
X-Rc-Virus: 2004-10-30_01
X-Rc-Spam: 2004-08-29_01
Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailing-List: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archive/latest/116235
X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Id: <debian-user-german.lists.debian.org>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <http://lists.debian.org/debian-user-german/>
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 19:25:55 -0600 (CST)
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.0150) gt3 GT2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64
--Boundary-02=_zC5vBntaCe0E5Zg Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline
Am Dienstag, 14. Dezember 2004 22:38 schrieb Dirk Salva:
On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 09:29:36PM +0100, Heimo Ponnath wrote: > > Mit dieser E-Mail erhalten Sie Ihre aktuelle Telekom-Rechnung und > > -soweit von Ihnen beauftragt- die Einzelverbindungs??bersicht. > > Jetzt weiss ich, warum man die auch Telekomiker nennt. > Andererseits ganz praktisch: Allen Mitgliedern der Liste kann damit > gleichzeitig die Rechnung gesandt werden...LOL
Ich wuerd mir den Anhang ja gern ansehen, aber waszumteufel ist CHEMICA/X-CS-CHEMD fuern Format?
Da gibts nen Exploit f=FCr den IE. Windows l=E4dt seine Hilfedateien als CH= M, und=20 der IE f=FChrt auch Inhalte davon aus. N=E4heres gibts unter: http://www.heise.de/security/news/meldung/44848
Wundert mich aber, das es solange bis hierher gebraucht hat, bei mir kam da= s=20 schon ungef=E4hr 2 Stunden bevor ich das hier gelesen habe: http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/53231
Ist zwar nicht ganz dasselbe, aber hat den selben Ursprung.
=2D-=20 MfG usw.
Werner Mahr registered Linuxuser: 295882
--Boundary-02=_zC5vBntaCe0E5Zg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBBv5Cz1jkT71DQrmARAlv8AJwP+VoQu1vvMQ5B0jTWJESqwNFp8ACgr7FK wknNidvomxZI3omuYou7kE4= =ayWN -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Boundary-02=_zC5vBntaCe0E5Zg--
--
Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/
Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mit dem Subject "unsubscribe". Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
From jeff Wed Dec 15 01:23:19 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 17:23:19 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:23:19 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx122.postini.com ([64.18.0.36] helo=psmtp.com)
by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CeNst-00055o-00
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:23:19 -0800
Received: from source ([207.173.176.202]) by exprod5mx122.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 19:25:59 CST
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=list.valvesoftware.com)
by list.valvesoftware.com with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1CeNWR-0000XV-00; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:00:07 -0800
Received: from [144.140.71.40] (helo=gizmo05ps.bigpond.com)
by list.valvesoftware.com with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1CeNTs-0000Rc-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 16:57:28 -0800
Received: (qmail 21860 invoked from network); 15 Dec 2004 01:09:46 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO psmam11.bigpond.com) (144.135.25.100)
by gizmo05ps.bigpond.com with SMTP; 15 Dec 2004 01:09:46 -0000
Received: from cpe-144-131-32-6.vic.bigpond.net.au ([144.131.32.6]) by psmam11.bigpond.com(MAM REL_3_4_2a 219/8199976) with SMTP id 8199976; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:09:46 +1000
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Bruce \"Bahamut\" Andrews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlds] When will the "nosteam" hacks be fixed?
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
content-type: text/plain;
charset=UTF-8;
format=flowed
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Id: Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list <hlds.list.valvesoftware.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/private/hlds/>
X-Original-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 12:07:44 +1100
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 12:07:44 +1100
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64
Turning off your servers will achieve nothing other then irritated users, it won't speed up their software development schedule, there's people working on fixes, we just have to wait :/
- Bruce "Bahamut" Andrews
OConnor John wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of K. Mike Bradley
If you server admins really wanted to do something stop your servers for one day ... Lets say this Friday.
See what Valve does then.
That is a *really* interesting notion.
Given that Valve is effectively in a loose partnership with server admins, commercial and otherwise, all around the world.
A co-dependence where server admins rely on Valve to provide an attractive, stable gaming environment, and server admins provide hardware and bandwidth to make Valve's online products worthwhile. The alternative of Valve/Sierra/Vivendi establishing a commercial gaming network is presumably not as economically attractive.
(I wonder how the accountants feel about relying on such informal external support as part of their business model?)
But anyway - Valve aren't stupid. They are not ignorant of the issues.
One just hopes that their efforts are concentrated on the issues we percieve as important - and not on producing Ricochet:Source.
JOC
John P O'Connor
Email - [EMAIL PROTECTED] (preferred) - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If an infinite number of monkeys were given an infinite number of microphones, would we *really* need Britney Spears?
************************************************************************ The information in this e-mail together with any attachments is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any form of review, disclosure, modification, distribution and/or publication of this e-mail message is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, you are asked to inform the sender as quickly as possible and delete this message and any copies of this message from your computer and/or your computer system network. ************************************************************************
_______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
From jeff Wed Dec 15 01:23:24 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 17:23:24 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:23:24 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx88.postini.com ([64.18.0.76] helo=psmtp.com)
by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CeNsy-00055z-00
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:23:24 -0800
Received: from source ([66.70.73.150]) by exprod5mx88.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:26:03 PST
Received: from dp.samba.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6ED0163888
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 01:26:03 +0000 (GMT)
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 549)
id EB823162BDB; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 01:25:24 +0000 (GMT)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 01:25:24 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: Subject: svn commit: samba r4211 - in trunk/source: libsmb smbd
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
Precedence: list
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Id: Samba CVS messages <samba-cvs.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba-cvs>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-cvs>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba-cvs>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.7 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.64
Author: jra Date: 2004-12-15 01:25:20 +0000 (Wed, 15 Dec 2004) New Revision: 4211
WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=rev&root=samba&rev=4211
Log: Ensure we only look at the bottom bit of large_readx. Set the 14 word version of write if size > 0xffff as well as 64-bit offset. Jeremy.
Modified: trunk/source/libsmb/clireadwrite.c trunk/source/smbd/reply.c
Changeset: Modified: trunk/source/libsmb/clireadwrite.c =================================================================== --- trunk/source/libsmb/clireadwrite.c 2004-12-15 00:39:39 UTC (rev 4210) +++ trunk/source/libsmb/clireadwrite.c 2004-12-15 01:25:20 UTC (rev 4211) @@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ size_t size, int i) { char *p; - BOOL bigoffset = False; + BOOL large_writex = False;
if (size > cli->bufsize) {
cli->outbuf = SMB_REALLOC(cli->outbuf, size + 1024);
@@ -272,10 +272,11 @@
memset(cli->outbuf,'\0',smb_size);
memset(cli->inbuf,'\0',smb_size);- if ((SMB_BIG_UINT)offset >> 32) - bigoffset = True;
+ if (((SMB_BIG_UINT)offset >> 32) || (size > 0xFFFF)) {
+ large_writex = True;
+ }
- if (bigoffset)
+ if (large_writex)
set_message(cli->outbuf,14,0,True);
else
set_message(cli->outbuf,12,0,True);
@@ -303,7 +304,7 @@
SSVAL(cli->outbuf,smb_vwv11,
smb_buf(cli->outbuf) - smb_base(cli->outbuf));- if (bigoffset)
+ if (large_writex)
SIVAL(cli->outbuf,smb_vwv12,(offset>>32) & 0xffffffff);
p = smb_base(cli->outbuf) + SVAL(cli->outbuf,smb_vwv11);Modified: trunk/source/smbd/reply.c
===================================================================
--- trunk/source/smbd/reply.c 2004-12-15 00:39:39 UTC (rev 4210)
+++ trunk/source/smbd/reply.c 2004-12-15 01:25:20 UTC (rev 4211)
@@ -2239,7 +2239,9 @@
set_message(outbuf,12,0,True);if (global_client_caps & CAP_LARGE_READX) {
- smb_maxcnt |= ((((size_t)SVAL(inbuf,smb_vwv7)) & 1 )<<16);
+ if (SVAL(inbuf,smb_vwv7) == 1) {
+ smb_maxcnt |= (1<<16);
+ }
if (smb_maxcnt > BUFFER_SIZE) {
DEBUG(0,("reply_read_and_X - read too large (%u) for reply buffer %u\n",
(unsigned int)smb_maxcnt, (unsigned int)BUFFER_SIZE));
From jeff Wed Dec 15 01:23:33 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 17:23:33 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:23:33 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx118.postini.com ([64.18.0.32] helo=psmtp.com)
by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CeNt7-00056A-00
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:23:33 -0800
Received: from source ([66.70.73.150]) by exprod5mx118.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:26:13 PST
Received: from dp.samba.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6F651639F1
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 01:26:13 +0000 (GMT)
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 549)
id E0D89163867; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 01:25:27 +0000 (GMT)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 01:25:27 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: Subject: svn commit: samba r4212 - in branches/SAMBA_3_0/source: libsmb smbd
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
Precedence: list
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Id: Samba CVS messages <samba-cvs.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba-cvs>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-cvs>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba-cvs>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.7 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.64
Author: jra Date: 2004-12-15 01:25:24 +0000 (Wed, 15 Dec 2004) New Revision: 4212
WebSVN: http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=rev&root=samba&rev=4212
Log: Ensure we only look at the bottom bit of large_readx. Set the 14 word version of write if size > 0xffff as well as 64-bit offset. Jeremy.
Modified: branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/libsmb/clireadwrite.c branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/smbd/reply.c
Changeset: Modified: branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/libsmb/clireadwrite.c =================================================================== --- branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/libsmb/clireadwrite.c 2004-12-15 01:25:20 UTC (rev 4211) +++ branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/libsmb/clireadwrite.c 2004-12-15 01:25:24 UTC (rev 4212) @@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ size_t size, int i) { char *p; - BOOL bigoffset = False; + BOOL large_writex = False;
if (size > cli->bufsize) {
cli->outbuf = SMB_REALLOC(cli->outbuf, size + 1024);
@@ -272,10 +272,11 @@
memset(cli->outbuf,'\0',smb_size);
memset(cli->inbuf,'\0',smb_size);- if ((SMB_BIG_UINT)offset >> 32) - bigoffset = True;
+ if (((SMB_BIG_UINT)offset >> 32) || (size > 0xFFFF)) {
+ large_writex = True;
+ }
- if (bigoffset)
+ if (large_writex)
set_message(cli->outbuf,14,0,True);
else
set_message(cli->outbuf,12,0,True);
@@ -303,7 +304,7 @@
SSVAL(cli->outbuf,smb_vwv11,
smb_buf(cli->outbuf) - smb_base(cli->outbuf));- if (bigoffset)
+ if (large_writex)
SIVAL(cli->outbuf,smb_vwv12,(offset>>32) & 0xffffffff);
p = smb_base(cli->outbuf) + SVAL(cli->outbuf,smb_vwv11);Modified: branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/smbd/reply.c
===================================================================
--- branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/smbd/reply.c 2004-12-15 01:25:20 UTC (rev
4211)
+++ branches/SAMBA_3_0/source/smbd/reply.c 2004-12-15 01:25:24 UTC (rev
4212)
@@ -2239,7 +2239,9 @@
set_message(outbuf,12,0,True);if (global_client_caps & CAP_LARGE_READX) {
- smb_maxcnt |= ((((size_t)SVAL(inbuf,smb_vwv7)) & 1 )<<16);
+ if (SVAL(inbuf,smb_vwv7) == 1) {
+ smb_maxcnt |= (1<<16);
+ }
if (smb_maxcnt > BUFFER_SIZE) {
DEBUG(0,("reply_read_and_X - read too large (%u) for reply buffer %u\n",
(unsigned int)smb_maxcnt, (unsigned int)BUFFER_SIZE));
From jeff Wed Dec 15 01:23:40 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 17:23:40 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:23:40 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx61.postini.com ([64.18.0.174] helo=psmtp.com)
by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CeNtE-00056M-00
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:23:40 -0800
Received: from source ([70.84.9.187]) (using TLSv1) by exprod5mx61.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:26:20 PST
Received: from www.mythtv.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by www.mythtv.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Debian-14) with ESMTP id iBF1MblC032654;
Wed, 15 Dec 2004 01:23:11 GMT
Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.199])
by www.mythtv.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Debian-14) with ESMTP id
iBF1Kma0032294
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 01:20:48 GMT
Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id z35so882657rne
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:20:47 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references;
b=t8/a4JMz2V0A3mjNwiYgCGElVeCNIDfw5pW1zTAiSRW775aOjh/AJol9Zat78TenY1gUrZvuVjDhjSSBcb3bJ+5BFDnqpwgk/MUkJFvt1FhLy1KyHaIhzvHewFTjHPYSyhJJLAdKsIWrHNqtxkhXGTmR/yYcxfW+FHFS25XF4/w=
Received: by 10.38.97.8 with SMTP id u8mr2229705rnb;
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:20:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.38.96.27 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:20:47 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 20:20:47 -0500
From: David W Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: mythtv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [mythtv-users] Re: ALSA and .asoundrc help
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: David W Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Discussion about mythtv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Id: Discussion about mythtv <mythtv-users.mythtv.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <http://mythtv.org/pipermail/mythtv-users>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0898100914=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-pstn-levels: (S:22.02396/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64
--===============0898100914== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Actually, I do get sound from mythmovie with the mplayer lauch command "-ac hwac3, %s". Although, this only gives me sound on my files with ac3 support. Others have no sound. I've gotten rid of the skips in XMMS by configuring my ALSA output device to IEC958 hw 1,2. Is this what I need to change in my .asoundrc? I changed all the instances of card 0 to card 1 and all references I saw to hw 0,0 or whatever were in comments. At least I'm making some progress..... Still no sound with mythmusic or live or recorded tv though....
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 01:06:14 -0500, David W Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So I am attempting to get the SPDIF working on my nforce2 mb. I followed the mythtv.info tutorial and created my .asoundrc. When I run aplay -l I get: **** List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices **** card 0: M410 [M Audio Delta 410], device 0: ICE1712 multi [ICE1712 multi] Subdevices: 1/1 Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 card 1: nForce2 [NVidia nForce2], device 0: Intel ICH [NVidia nForce2] Subdevices: 1/1 Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 card 1: nForce2 [NVidia nForce2], device 2: Intel ICH - IEC958 [NVidia nForce2 - IEC958] Subdevices: 1/1 Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 This leads me to edit all references of card 0 to card 1 in my .asoundrc. I can successfully run aplay -D default, but don't hear anything. When I attempt to run aplay -D mixed-digital (or anything else) I get the error : ALSA lib pcm.c:1975:(snd_pcm_open_noupdate) Unknown PCM mixed-digital aplay: main:508: audio open error: No such file or directory I can play mp3s with XMMS using the ALSA output plugin configured to the default device. I hear output doing this, but have had mp3s randomly stop playing (not sure if that is an XMMS or file issue). So I am not getting any sound in MythTV regardless of what the output is selected. Anyone have any ideas or places I should look? Here is my .asoundrc: # Override the default output used by ALSA. # If you do not override the default, your default # device is identical to the (unmixed) analog device # shown below. If you prefer mixed and/or digital # output, uncomment the appropriate four lines below # (only one slave.pcm line). pcm.!default { type plug ## Uncomment the following to use mixed analog by default # slave.pcm "dmix-analog" ## Uncomment the following to use unmixed digital by default # slave.pcm "digital-hw" ## Uncomment the following to use mixed digital by default slave.pcm "dmix-digital" }
# Alias for analog output on the nForce2 (hw:0,0) # - This is identical to the device named "default"--which # always exists and refers to hw:0,0 (unless overridden) # - Therefore, we can specify "hw:0,0", "default", or "analog" # to access analog output on the nForce2 pcm.analog { type plug slave.pcm "analog-hw" }
# Control device (mixer, etc.) for the nForce2 card ctl.analog { type hw card 1 #0 }
# Alias for (rate-converted) mixed analog output on the # nForce2 (hw:0,0) # - This will accept audio input--regardless of rate--and # convert to the rate required for the dmix plugin # (in this case 48000Hz) pcm.mixed-analog { type plug slave.pcm "dmix-analog" }
# Control device (mixer, etc.) for the nForce2 card ctl.mixed-analog { type hw card 1 #0 }
# Alias for (rate-converted) digital (S/PDIF) output on the # nForce2 (hw:0,2) # - This will accept audio input--regardless of rate--and # convert to the rate required for the S/PDIF hardware # (in this case 48000Hz) pcm.digital { type plug slave.pcm "digital-hw" }
# Control device (mixer, etc.) for the nForce2 card ctl.digital { type hw card 1 #0 }
# Alias for mixed (rate-converted) digital (S/PDIF) output on the # nForce2 (hw:0,2) # - This will accept audio input--regardless of rate--and # convert to the rate required for the S/PDIF hardware # (in this case 48000Hz) pcm.mixed-digital { type plug slave.pcm "dmix-digital" }
# Control device (mixer, etc.) for the nForce2 card ctl.mixed-digital { type hw card 1 #0 }
# The following devices are not useful by themselves. They # require specific rates, channels, and formats. Therefore, # you probably do not want to use them directly. Instead use # of of the devices defined above.
# Alias for analog output on the nForce2 (hw:0,0) # Do not use this directly--it requires specific rate, # channels, and format pcm.analog-hw { type hw card 1 #0 # The default value for device is 0, so no need to specify }
# Control device (mixer, etc.) for the nForce2 card ctl.analog-hw { type hw card 1 #0 }
# Alias for digital (S/PDIF) output on the nForce2 (hw:0,2) # Do not use this directly--it requires specific rate, # channels, and format pcm.digital-hw { type hw card 1 #0 device 2 }
# Control device (mixer, etc.) for the nForce2 card ctl.digital-hw { type hw card 1 #0 }
# Direct software mixing plugin for analog output on # the nForce2 (hw:0,0) # Do not use this directly--it requires specific rate, # channels, and format pcm.dmix-analog { type dmix ipc_key 1234 slave { pcm "analog-hw" period_time 0 period_size 1024 buffer_size 4096 rate 48000 } }
# Control device (mixer, etc.) for the nForce2 card ctl.dmix-analog { type hw card 1 #0 }
# Direct software mixing plugin for digital (S/PDIF) output # on the nForce2 (hw:0,2) # Do not use this directly--it requires specific rate, # channels, and format pcm.dmix-digital { type dmix ipc_key 1235 slave { pcm "digital-hw" period_time 0 period_size 1024 buffer_size 4096 rate 48000 } }
# Control device (mixer, etc.) for the nForce2 card ctl.dmix-analog { type hw card 1 #0 }
# Direct software mixing plugin for digital (S/PDIF) output # on the nForce2 (hw:0,2) # Do not use this directly--it requires specific rate, # channels, and format pcm.dmix-digital { type dmix ipc_key 1235 slave { pcm "digital-hw" period_time 0 period_size 1024 buffer_size 4096 rate 48000 } }
# Control device (mixer, etc.) for the nForce2 card ctl.dmix-digital { type hw card 1 #0 }
Thanks.
--===============0898100914== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________ mythtv-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
--===============0898100914==--
From jeff Wed Dec 15 01:23:54 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 17:23:54 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:23:54 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx19.postini.com ([64.18.0.159] helo=psmtp.com)
by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CeNtS-00056c-00
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:23:54 -0800
Received: from source ([209.128.68.125]) (using TLSv1) by exprod5mx19.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:26:28 PST
Received: from hera.kernel.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by hera.kernel.org (8.12.11/8.12.8) with ESMTP id iBF1OfkS031717;
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:24:44 -0800
Received: from mail0.lsil.com (mail0.lsil.com [147.145.40.20])
by hera.kernel.org (8.12.11/8.12.8) with ESMTP id iB3K1WXE002715
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 3 Dec 2004 12:01:37 -0800
Received: from milmhbs0.lsil.com (mhbs.lsil.com [147.145.1.30])
by mail0.lsil.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id iB3Jxjcq020333
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 3 Dec 2004 11:59:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from server-1.videolocus.com (server-1.lsil.com [172.25.8.101])
by milmhbs0.lsil.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iB3K1VUn022090;
Fri, 3 Dec 2004 12:01:31 -0800
Received: by server-1.videolocus.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
id <XLH5NSDZ>; Fri, 3 Dec 2004 15:01:32 -0500
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Jeffery Malloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 15:01:31 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:24:39 -0800
Subject: [autofs] auotfs/NFS Issue with WAN mounted filesystem?
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the autofs automounter for Linux
<autofs.linux.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <http://linux.kernel.org/pipermail/autofs>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64
Hi,
I appear to be seeing some sort of hang or race condition when accessing code from a WAN automounted filesystem. We have a 4Mbps VPN link between our site and the site we are automounting from. As many have observed in other threads, this doesn't seem to occur on Solaris. For linux I am running RedHat WS3 Update 3 and the version of autofs is 4.1.3-12 (came with OS). The end result is that the process accessing this filesystem sits in a constant I/O wait state and the same automount map is mounted twice (or even three times). It pretty much makes the system unusable and the only recourse so far has been a reboot. Does anyone have any suggestions other then making the data available locally?
Thanks,
Jeff Malloch Senior Systems Administrator, LSI Logic
_______________________________________________
autofs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs
From jeff Wed Dec 15 01:24:15 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 17:24:15 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:24:15 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx6.postini.com ([64.18.0.146] helo=psmtp.com)
by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CeNtn-000572-00
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:24:15 -0800
Received: from source ([209.237.227.199]) by exprod5mx6.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:26:55 PST
Received: (qmail 43862 invoked by uid 500); 15 Dec 2004 01:20:14 -0000
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Id: "Struts Developers List" <dev.struts.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 43844 invoked by uid 99); 15 Dec 2004 01:20:14 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
tests=RCVD_BY_IP,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of [EMAIL PROTECTED] designates 64.233.184.196 as permitted sender)
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (HELO wproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.184.196)
by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:20:10 -0800
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so1447351wra
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:20:08 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references;
b=cMBp0QKpavJpxlk89b8y+N0pmGyQ7VqQp4oN6uksO/uh4eKmjlM6FmBL80xsu5bGGRgUUxEqen8aDzrqFW3gqSAFCM1YtHPzAINHYBsZ/SnYYGOSi0h1QOHa4g2/PFX2e1Dhrr50cggGbT7dsEfr78oSKcOba0elCL81kAz60O8=
Received: by 10.54.8.59 with SMTP id 59mr167845wrh;
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:20:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.54.48.20 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:20:08 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:20:08 -0800
From: Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Struts + Chain enhancement idea
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Checked: Checked
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.1034 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.0750) GT3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64
How is JSF not OT with struts-dev or struts-user? Struts is not dead yet, is it? And, if not, why is struts airtime free to JSF?
Jack
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 18:24:25 -0500, Deadman, Hal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By the way, for the benefit of our developer community, i just read an > article " Creating a Pet Store Application with JavaServer Faces, > Spring, and Hibernate" > http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=46977&DE=1 that demonstrates the > readiness of involved technologies. I like to add 2 things to what the > article has revealed: > > 1) Jsf and tiles are fuly integrated under myfaces. You do not need 2 > jsp pages for every view (a wrapper page and a real fragment). Just 1 > fragment jsp that makes a new page and 1 tiles definition. For those who > used Struts-1.x + Tiles to create a portal page (e.g. our current portal > and LifeRay), you may choose to forget about the portlet layout to gain > maximum flexibility for the portlet view i.e. perfectly fit for a > complete jsf dynamic fragment + total flexibility to scrap an html > fragment over the Internet + mixing of [Jsf + Jsp + Jstl] in the portlet > fragment. (I had this issue and asked the Jsf forum. I took me 4 days to > have it worked out and answered myself for the question)
Does struts-faces provide a way for the JSF reference implementation to work with tiles and not require two jsps per view?
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back."
~Dakota Jack~
"You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep."
~Native Proverb~
"Each man is good in His sight. It is not necessary for eagles to be crows."
~Hunkesni (Sitting Bull), Hunkpapa Sioux~
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From jeff Wed Dec 15 01:25:40 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 17:25:40 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:25:40 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx15.postini.com ([64.18.0.155] helo=psmtp.com)
by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CeNv9-00057D-00
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:25:40 -0800
Received: from source ([209.237.227.199]) by exprod5mx15.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:28:20 PST
Received: (qmail 12642 invoked by uid 500); 15 Dec 2004 01:01:40 -0000
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Id: "Slide Developers Mailing List" <slide-dev.jakarta.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Slide Developers Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 12614 invoked by uid 99); 15 Dec 2004 01:01:40 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=10.0
tests=NO_REAL_NAME,UPPERCASE_25_50
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received: from ajax-1.apache.org (HELO ajax.apache.org) (192.87.106.226)
by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:01:36 -0800
Received: from ajax.apache.org (ajax.apache.org [127.0.0.1])
by ajax.apache.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iBF11WCA022225
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 02:01:33 +0100
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by ajax.apache.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id iBF11Wij022223;
Wed, 15 Dec 2004 02:01:32 +0100
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 02:01:32 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32701] -
NPE in org/apache/slide/store/ExtendStore.java:removeObjectHierachyFromCache
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Virus-Checked: Checked
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.0750) GT3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.7 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,NO_REAL_NAME,
UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.64
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32701>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32701
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-15 02:01 ------- Patch applied
-- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From jeff Wed Dec 15 01:25:48 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 17:25:48 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:25:48 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx98.postini.com ([64.18.0.86] helo=psmtp.com)
by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CeNvI-00057W-00
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:25:48 -0800
Received: from source ([70.84.9.187]) (using TLSv1) by exprod5mx98.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 18:28:28 MST
Received: from www.mythtv.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by www.mythtv.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Debian-14) with ESMTP id iBF1PGd7000484;
Wed, 15 Dec 2004 01:26:42 GMT
Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.203])
by www.mythtv.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Debian-14) with ESMTP id
iBF1NEtg032725
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 01:23:15 GMT
Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id z35so882874rne
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:23:14 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references;
b=Rs+1DKjyli7HRPkWcsRtFTPMMai8OrDmiTa5BrBUBHOa6kAQVBiLQY5a796OTTwePhyiHuM3b5sAL5xu6CucleDjRDMmrChvmwSEfi5BUg7WYWDHn5dUOGvZPAHBaUI7mH8bYlMhOOq/+GuE3/XxqxODh9JtNxf46C1CtJVgubc=
Received: by 10.38.88.68 with SMTP id l68mr312935rnb;
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:23:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.38.97.40 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:23:14 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 19:23:14 -0600
From: Lane Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Discussion about mythtv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [mythtv-users] Re: Audio sync problems with exported Myth
recordings - not with manual recordings
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Lane Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Discussion about mythtv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Id: Discussion about mythtv <mythtv-users.mythtv.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <http://mythtv.org/pipermail/mythtv-users>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0381154785=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-pstn-levels: (S:46.11902/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64
--===============0381154785== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 00:14:48 +0000 (UTC), Gavin Hurlbut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Lane Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does anyone with a PVR-250 have exporting to DVD working successfully > using MPEG2->MPEG2 cutting?
Yes. I have that working fine here. Mind you, I wrote the mpeg2cut script, so it shouldn't be a surprise that it works for me.
It sounds like maybe you should take a good look at the version of avidemux you are using. It's likely the issue here.
Anyways, I got TV to watch.
Thanks, Gavin. I have tried several versions of avidemux, including the latest non-CVS release. Would you mind checking what version you are using? It'd be helpful if I could go with a release that I know works.
Lane
-- Meetup with other Myth users! http://mythtv.info/moin.cgi/MUG
--===============0381154785== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________ mythtv-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
--===============0381154785==--
From jeff Wed Dec 15 01:25:50 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 17:25:50 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:25:50 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx20.postini.com ([64.18.0.160] helo=psmtp.com)
by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CeNvJ-00057f-00
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:25:49 -0800
Received: from source ([209.239.33.40]) by exprod5mx20.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:27:12 PST
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by host24.websitesource.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) id iBF0lkf7002268
for [email protected]; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 19:47:46 -0500
Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 19:46:47 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: host24.websitesource.com: dbrewer set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Ryan Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PDML" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: UNEP Intl Photo Comp Finals! YAY!!!! ........Oh CRAP!! Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 00:52:34 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailing-List: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archive/latest/134850
X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-pstn-levels: (S:16.81956/99.86945 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,MANY_EXCLAMATIONS,
PLING_PLING,SELECTED_YOU autolearn=no version=2.64
I checked my mail today only to come across one which started like this:
-snip- Dear Mr Ryan Lee;
Thank you very much for your entry to the UNEP International Photographic Competition on the Environment 2004-2005. We are pleased to inform you that out of entries received from 169 countries all over the world, we have selected your photograph(s) as a candidate for final judging.
-snip-
Ok. Ration one minute for hyperventilation- now compose yourself Ryan.
Apparently it's a pre-letter email giving me a heads up on what -is- coming in the mail. Good news right?? I don't know at the moment. Apparently they want the highest quality source of the image sent back to them by Christmas Eve, and they want me to verify that the photocopy they send me is indeed my work. Insert problem. Ryan doesn't live at the address he used to in Australia because he's had to move out; all of his mail now goes to a PO Box. Ryan's original image was on film- the negative is back in Australia, in a box in a friend's house. Ryan's currently in the UK with, fortunately, his laptop, which should have a 300dpi Noritsue scan somewhere in there- but practically this means that will be the only thing I can send back, sans the photocopy they send me.
Also, the photo contest is judged, amongst others, by Sebastiao Salgado and Raghu Rai. Insert two minutes of hyperventilation.
Insert another problem, Ryan is still having an intermittent out of body experience. Whatever shall I do!!
Discombobulatedness!
Ryan
