On 18 Dec 2004 at 23:37, Steve Jolly wrote: > Ah, possibly part of the reason for the lack of contrast (also mentioned > by Shel) was that the tomato was very green... there's a lesson for me > there about pre-visualisation and the kind of assumptions that a viewer > of the final image is likely to make, I think. :-)
Yes, I see now it's not a cherry tom, it was quite small. I just made a shot in my garden of a larger green tomato. It was backlit and although I shot it colour using the *ist D I did do it at ISO3200 and I've simulated filtration and retained the "natural" image grain. I'm not suggesting it's a work of art but I think the greater contrast provides more to look at? http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio/temp/IMGP9347.jpg Cheers, Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
