Huh?, are you saying that since the seller overgraded it
or made gross errors ( gross meaning big, not distusting)
then the buyer should be happy/lucky to get only some of his
money back? That's absurd. When I run into that type situation
I always insist on a FULL REFUND INCLUDING ALL SHIPPING and nearly
always get
it too because I only buy from sellers with near perfect
feedback ratings and very smartly they don't risk ruining
their reputation over a few lousy shipping dollars when
THEY ARE THE ONE who made the listing mistake in the first
place and hence caused the whole problem to begin with. 
JCO

-----Original Message-----
From: Alan Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 7:55 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: K15/3.5 (was Re: ok, who got it?)


--- "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I said "in the case of gross errors in the listing"
> Of course if it was listed properly the buyer does
> not have a valid reason to return it,
> he agreed to buy it when he bid on it in the first place
> and cannot just "change his mind" and ask to return it 
> unless it isnt as described (seller error).

I think if the seller was gross enough to describe the condition much
better than it actually is (and many do), the buyer would be lucky to
get the refund minus shipping.

=====
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan


                
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250

Reply via email to