On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 01:22:39 -0500, frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > They certainly are taking a long time to load (they're still loading > as I type this - I just got real bored of waiting). Maybe it's my old > computer, but there are still a few of us using equipment that's a > couple of years old. > > I'd prefer a few photos that will load quickly, than a dozen that are > still loading after what seems like about 5 minutes. > > I'll go see if they're done loading now... > > cheers, > frank
Okay, now that I've gone and look at the photos, they're mostly okay - maybe even pretty good. I think there are too many of them. You could probably lose about 1/2 to 2/3 of them, and it would have much more impact. For instance, the last of the series, the two fellows playing acoustic guitar, are all pretty much the same. They could be cut down to one, maybe two photos pretty easily, and those one or two would be more effective. My opinions might be different if I either knew the band, or knew of them, neither of which is the case. If the intention of these photos is to show your friends, all of whom know the band, or are fans of the band or some such thing, then the number of photos for that purpose might be okay. I hope I'm making sense (but fear I'm not <g>). cheers, frank > -- > "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson > -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
