I didn't have to do the H shape hole, the plastic is
stiff enough that I stick the 200T in and it 'snaps'
right on to the slots that mount filters on the flash. ;-)
I've got the foil in, the thing I need to do is find
some white material to soften the light a bit more.
The flash is too close to the lid for the lid to diffuse
it much.
I've got some tracing paper around here somewhere,
might work if I can find it. ;-/

Don

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Graywolf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 1:32 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: $3.00 Super Flash Diffuser!
> 
> 
> Sure the bowl thing works well. Glue some aluminum foil inside 
> the bowl. When 
> you cut the hole for the flash cut it "H" shaped
> 
> |   |
>   ---
> |   |
> 
> Fold the flaps back and put a heavy rubber band about them and 
> the flash head to 
> hold in place. Works pretty well especially if you have a flash 
> with a remote 
> sensor option.
> 
> 
> graywolf
> http://www.graywolfphoto.com
> "Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
> -----------------------------------
> 
> 
> Don Sanderson wrote:
> > Getting a little tired of all the $35.00-$100.00 gizmos out
> > there to soften flash, most of which don't seem to do much,
> > I started playing around with some "Houshold Goods".
> > Here's what I came up with:
> > http://www.donsauction.com/pdml/FlashTest/Diffuser.htm
> > 
> > 2-$1.50 "Snack Tray" lids nested together.
> > 
> > A little white poster board for sides and to increase output,
> > a simple way to mount the thing to a stand and I'm all set.
> > 
> > I have some nice round bowls with the same type of lid
> > (translucent white polyethylene)
> > that I'm going to make a smaller, portable  field unit out of. 
> > Should just be able to cut a rectangular hole in the bottom
> > for the flash and Presto! :-)
> > 
> > Don (The cheap, but inventive)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.9 - Release Date: 1/6/2005
> 

Reply via email to