Didn't Contax make one too....? Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Peter J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 17. januar 2005 22:42 Til: [email protected] Emne: Re: *istD AF performance (was Re: Sigma 2.8 Zoom lens comments) Just the Canon, and the Kodak semi twins, (c/n), are full frame as far as I can recall. Jens Bladt wrote: >I don't know the 1Ds. But, I believe 95% of all digies are less than full >frame. >Jens Bladt >mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt > > >-----Oprindelig meddelelse----- >Fra: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sendt: 17. januar 2005 12:48 >Til: pentax list >Emne: Re: *istD AF performance (was Re: Sigma 2.8 Zoom lens comments) > > >On 17/1/05, Cotty, discombobulated, unleashed: > > > >>>T answer his question: Yes, there's is a difference. Due to the grater >>>enlargement (crop factor) the shutter speed necessary to "freeze" movent >>>must be divided by the crop factor: If i.e. a 250mm is used: 1/250 >>> >>> >divided > > >>>by i.e. 1.5 = 1/375 sec. >>> >>>90% out of focus! That bad! >>> >>> > >I mean for crying out loud, it's a 1Ds - there *is no crop factor* >involved - it's a full frame camera. What planet do these people come from ? > > > > >Cheers, > Cotty > > >___/\__ >|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche >||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com >_____________________________ > > > > > > > -- I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war. During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings and shoot foreigners - two things that are usually frowned on during peacetime. --P.J. O'Rourke
