On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 21:58:49 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quoting frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Owning an LX and an MX, I have no desire to get another ME Super. I truly > can't think of anything they do that the LX doesn't do better -- except for > the size/weight/noise issue, and the MX matches them there. > I love both my MX and my LX. If I could get another of either of those bodies for the price of an ME, I surely would. But, here in the Great White North, it's hard to find a decent MX for under $300 Cdn, and an LX for under $500 (note that I said, "hard to", but not impossible). Meanwhile, an ME can be gotten at used camera shops for about $100, with a warrantee and everything. That's hard to beat for a nice, compact, metal-bodied camera. cheers, frank -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
