Quoting frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 21:58:49 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Quoting frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > Owning an LX and an MX, I have no desire to get another ME Super. I > truly > > can't think of anything they do that the LX doesn't do better -- except > for > > the size/weight/noise issue, and the MX matches them there. > > > > I love both my MX and my LX. If I could get another of either of > those bodies for the price of an ME, I surely would. But, here in the > Great White North, it's hard to find a decent MX for under $300 Cdn, > and an LX for under $500 (note that I said, "hard to", but not > impossible). > > Meanwhile, an ME can be gotten at used camera shops for about $100, > with a warrantee and everything. That's hard to beat for a nice, > compact, metal-bodied camera.
Well, of course, to each ... If you do get yourself an ME Super, it'll have a good home and you'll put it to good use. I probably shouldn't have said what I did in the first place. And you're right about it being a good price for a nice, compact, metal- bodied camera. ERNR
