Quoting Michael Heim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Yes, the January 2005 issue. I seem to remember there's a table in there > >comparing caffeine content between different things. > >Incidentally, it seems the photographs in that article were all shot on > d-d-d- > >digital. (Darkside, not Pentax. But nevertheless, it's only recently > that NGM > >has been running stories shot all digital.) > > I don't mind wether the pictures are shot digitally or with film (do > you?). I'm working as an editor for a newspaper and we almost only use > digital pictures. > I used to take pictures on film 'till two years ago. But today, i think, > it doesn't make a difference any more for magazine or newspaper prints.
I found it interesting because that particular magazine held out longer than most. And you really can't tell the difference in the finished product (that is, in the pictures published in the magazine) between the ones that were film capture and those that were captured with a digital camera. ERNR
