On 24 Jan 2005 at 13:54, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > Since I was around and reading Playboy in the mid-late 1960s, > I'll tell you that I never liked the centerfolds. They looked > heavily processed and artificial, not like real women.
I'm just a bit too young to have been reading anything in the mid-late 60's but I do have a small collection of old National Geo mags and if the print in those was of comparable quality (not res wise but relative to colour/contrast) then I wouldn't be impressed. There used to be an excellent archive site that housed a decent scans of the PB of the month for a good number of the editions right back into the 50's, unfortunately I just checked the URL and it's been yanked. Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
