On 25 Jan 2005 at 14:37, John Whittingham wrote: > I'd much prefer to save the money and spend it on a good 36mm x 24mm digital > body. I would need more then one W/A lens or a very good zoom to replace 24mm, > 28mm and 35mm lenses not to mention 17mm rectilinear and 16mm Fisheye that I > also use from time to time.
Har, they'll try to wear you down. Next you'll be told that the new zooms perform as well as primes (unfortunately even some of the new "digital" primes aren't that spectacular in performance) and then you'll be told that loosing the aperture ring control made the camera affordable to produce and that it's progress and that you'll get used to it. Double har. Sorry if I sound a little cynical :-) Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
