On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:24:56 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don't agree. No inconsistency to me. And if you boil it down -- I think what > I originally said was that there was no universal objective truth. Only > subjective truth. But, some things are objectively true. G.W. Bush is the president of your country. In fact he was just inaugurated for his second term. Are those two facts not objectively true? If they're true everywhere, are they not universal? > > BTW, no one can debate me into a corner because I do not "play" by debating > rules. I find them totally silly. I have no idea what the rules of debate are... > > (Message resent, because it did not appear -- sorry if there are duplicates.) > > I will add to this resend, that you are equating universal object truth with > external reality. A common mistake. I'm intrigued. Since you brought it up, what's the difference? This isn't a trap, I really don't know. cheers, frank -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
