P� 26. jan. 2005 kl. 23.45 skrev Rob Studdert:

On 26 Jan 2005 at 22:38, DagT wrote:

The same here, my sample is sharp, even at 2.8.

I suppose the difference is between sharp and damn sharp.


Could be, as I never use a tripod I�d probably not notice the last bit :-)

I did make a 30x40cm print of this picture
http://www.foto.no/bildekritikk/images/130029.jpg

taken at 1/45s and f/4, and it�s pretty sharp.

This one
http://www.foto.no/bildekritikk/images/131838.jpg

is very sharp, but it should be with 1/90s and f/11.

DagT



Reply via email to