They don't really, they meter wide open, and stop down, all the way, for exposure. I suppose that on an LX you'd get
the proper exposure, in automatic mode, but you'd have not a clue what your actual shutter speed would be until
the shutter closed.


John Whittingham wrote:

Maybe we should let Pentax know and they can resolve the issue, soon :)

Something I've not got round to asking because I don't own a body aperture control camera or a lens without an aperture ring:

How do the new lenses perform on cameras without aperture control on the body? Say a Pentax LX, MX, KX.

John



---------- Original Message -----------
From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 09:09:51 +1000
Subject: Re: Things I like about aperture rings on lenses (was Re: Pentax 50mm News)




On 26 Jan 2005 at 21:59, John Whittingham wrote:



Now that's what I'd call progress :)


Hmm, yes, I still haven't seen such a list to show why thumb-wheel control is such an advantage over lens based aperture control :-)

Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998


------- End of Original Message -------






--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war. During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings and shoot foreigners - two things that are usually frowned on during peacetime.
--P.J. O'Rourke





Reply via email to