Hi, Mark.
This plug-in doesn't affect final image quality,
right?
It just has to do with preview?
And where you decide the memory allocation in Windows?
I thought it was only possible in Macs...
Thanks in advance

Albano


--- Mark Cassino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Last week I 
> learned about this "Adjusted Refresh Plug In"  - 
>
http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=2552
> - installing it 
> made a tremendous difference in performance. It
> still is not as fast as PS 
> 7, but then I'm doing more with 16 bit files,
> running the browser in the 
> back ground, etc - so I can understand a slight
> slowdown.  I also adjusted 
> _down_ the memory allocation for CS to 50%.  This
> was counter intuitive, but 
> I guess CS calls on Windows more, so Windows needs a
> bigger share of the 
> memory.  With those two changes I see no difference
> between CS and PS 7 
> working on 147 meg files (16 bit RAW files opened to
> max size.)  16 bit 6x7 
> scans (weighing in at ~400 megs before adding any
> layers) are still slow, 
> but workable.
> 
> - MCC
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> Mark Cassino Photography
> Kalamazoo, MI
> www.markcassino.com
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> 
> 
> > Juan Buhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>This is for the few PS experts we have in the
> list.
> >>
> >>When reading in a PEF file with the CS raw
> converter, do you ever use
> >>a higher resolution than the default of 3008x2008?
>  Is there any
> >>advantage to this, ie is it any different than
> resizing the image up
> >>later if you have a reason to?
> 
> 


=====
Albano Garcia
Photography & Graphic Design
http://www.albanogarcia.com.ar
http://www.flaneur.com.ar
 
 

 





                
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. 
http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo 

Reply via email to