"Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On 27 Jan 2005 at 9:11, Mark Roberts wrote: > >> The Ken Rockwell article is here: >> http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/raw.htm > >It's really quite a misleading article, a good reason to be more than dubious >of the content of his other publications.
Oh yes. I didn't even want to get into the technical merits (or, more specifically, the lack thereof) of his article(s). For me, his description of a well-reasoned opposing view as a "hate website" was enough. People like that aren't worth my time even if they have useful information to share. His technical information is largely rubbish, deliberately or unintentionally misleading. He rationalized away the difference between his Nikon D1x and the Canon 1Ds by noting (correctly) that a doubling of pixels yields only a 25% increase in linear resolution. But if you think about it for a moment, what would you give to be able to increase the resolution of all your lenses, for example, by 25%? ;-) -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com
