From: "Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [email protected] To: <[email protected]> Subject: Is Perntax the only one? Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 06:46:28 +0100
From time to time I get annoyed because Pentax ist-series doesn't support the apperture ring/aperture simulator (Grrr....). (For me, the main reason for staying with Pentax was the option to use old lenses/backwards compatibility - it still is though it's a PITA shooting in manual mode).
So my question is: Have other brands abandoned the aperture simulator/use of
an aperture ring as well - or is it just Pentax???
Hi Jens.
Canon and Minolta dont use the mechanical aperture-ring. Nikon also has lenses that only can be operated from the body.
Daniel, Sweden
Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 27. januar 2005 04:57 Til: [email protected] Emne: Re: [pdml] 31 Limited
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 22:03:45 -0500, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The 43 is standard equipment for me on my MX. Great lens.
Speaking of C'est What (as we were earlier), I recall that my MX got to try out your 43 Limited for a few minutes whilst we were there. They looked very happy together. In fact, one of the nicest looking body/lens combos I've ever seen.
cheers, frank
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
_________________________________________________________________ Hitta r�tt p� n�tet med MSN S�k http://search.msn.se/
