[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Mark wrote, >> >> The sensor was the Philips (later DALSA) FTF3020M, a 6 megapixel, 24 x >> 36mm bayer mosaic CCD. >> >Then I'm wrong.Has anyone been successful with this cenosr? >Has it proven to be any good?
Yes and no: http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/contax-n-digital.shtml Basically the image quality appears to be better than APS-sized 6-megapixel cameras but not as good at higher megapixel full-frame cameras (no surprise there). Still, it's very expensive, has a very limited selection of lenses (which are also very expensive), absolutely no third-party RAW support (and the supplied RAW converter seems very poor), no image review on the rear-panel display when shooting RAW (!), small, slow buffer and very high power consumption. Oh yes, and even with all these limitations it's very expensive, did I mention that? :) -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com
