Admittedly it's hard to tell differences, but for my taste the M looks just a little warmer which I'd prefer in this focal length.
John ---------- Original Message ----------- From: "Peter J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Sent: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 09:35:47 -0500 Subject: Re: DA40 vs M40 (Japanese) > The comparison photos show little difference in rendering the > scenes. There seems to be little to chose between the two optically. > > John Whittingham wrote: > > >>Translated: > >> > >> > > > >It loses a little in translation :) Personally I think I prefer the M 40. > > > >John > > > > > >---------- Original Message ----------- > >From: Michel Carr�re-G�e <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: [email protected] > >Sent: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 06:39:10 +0100 > >Subject: Re: DA40 vs M40 (Japanese) > > > > > > > >>Peter J. Alling a �crit : > >> > >> > >> > >>>I can't read Japanese but I did look at the pictures, I really want > >>>one of those DA lens hoods > >>>for my 40mm M. > >>> > >>> > >>Translated: > >>http://babel.altavista.com/babelfish/trurl_pagecontent? lp=ja_en&trurl=http% > >> > >> > >3a%2f%2fdc.watch.impress.co.jp%2fcda%2freview%2f2005%2f01%2f17%2f753.html > >------- End of Original Message ------- > > > > > > > > > > -- > I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war. > During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings > and shoot foreigners - two things that are usually frowned on during > peacetime. --P.J. O'Rourke ------- End of Original Message -------
