John Whittingham wrote on 2/22/2005, 11:11 AM:
> > They also have a 170-500 that > > looks interesting but would probably be too slow for my uses (f6.3 > > at the long end) > > There's the 135-400 as well but it's no 300 f/4, not a bad lens for an > extended zoom, aperture of f5.6 at the long end. > Yeah... It looks like the 135-400/4.5-5.6 is the replacement to the 400/5.6 much like the 100-300/4 is the replacement to the 300/4. -- Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
