Rick.You goota telle what the shop charged for the PZ-1p? Regards Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Rick Womer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 4. marts 2005 15:03 Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Emne: Re: PZ-1 versus PZ-1p Don, I have one of each in active use (or usually do, but the PZ-1 is in Colorado getting its health restored). I would definitely go for the PZ-1p. It's smoother, quieter, more grippable, has (slightly) faster AF, better pop-up flash coverage, easy flash exposure compensation (making fill-flash much easier), and more convenient access to custom functions. The PZ-1 has a couple of power zooming options the 1p doesn't have (two zoom memory settings instead of one, for example) but I'm not using power zooming lenses anyway. The PZ-1 also has an intervalometer, which I have used exactly twice in 12 years and 500+ rolls (I thought it might yield interesting spontaneous party candids. It doesn't.) The PZ-1p can be had for a song on eBay these days. A midwestern camera shop had one up earlier this week, factory refurbished with a 1y Pentax USA guarantee. Cheers, Rick --- Don Sanderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The Z/PZ series is the only Pentax series I've never > had the opportunity > to use. > In that I've heard so many good things about them I > was thinking of buying > one just to 'round out' my Pentax education. (Good > excuse, no?) ;-) > A question for you: Is the PZ-1 nearly as good as > the PZ-1p? > They go for a good bit less money, and if they're > worth the price they > are also a lot easier to find used. (Which is a bit > suspicious in itself.) > So, what say Ye? > > TIA > Don > > __________________________________ Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday! Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web http://birthday.yahoo.com/netrospective/