Shel Belinkoff wrote on 3/8/2005, 10:10 AM:
> Never having used a flash, forgive my ignorance. What makes the Sigma a > better choice than the Pentax? Almost flawless? Are there things about > flash that are problematical? Why is the istD "pretty much useless at > TTL > flash?" I'm looking at the Sigma for better "on-paper" features than both the AF360FGZ and AF500FTZ. The Sigma has bounce and swivel (unlike the 360) and has P-TTL (unlike the AF500) which is supposed to be better for the digital bodies. Mr. Robb and others complain of very inconsistent exposures using flash on the *ist D. Unlike Mr. Robb, there are some on this list who have had NO ISSUES with flash on the *ist D. Some say it can only be used at ISO 400. I use the AF360FGZ at ISO 200-800 and have no problems. -- Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
