the total system price (camera and a couple of lenses), were near the bottom in most comparisons
and quality, near the top. It will be hard to maintain that first one with a digital body. To keep
that they will have to have a perceived quality and similar feature set to the upcoming Canon 16mp
DSLR and a price closer to the current Kodak 14[x].
Mishka wrote:
why not? i would imagine, people who bought p645 were budget-conscious (or they would have bought contax instead), and for those, digital MF right now exists only in theory (pricewise). hopefully, D645 would cost less than a new car. then i would buy one.
best, mishka
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 12:23:23 +1000, Rob Studdert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 16 Mar 2005 at 20:14, Herb Chong wrote:
the 645D will attract a negligible number of non-Pentax MF owners. it's job is
to prevent further defections.
.. in two years time? :-(
Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war. During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings and shoot foreigners - two things that are usually frowned on during peacetime.
--P.J. O'Rourke
