Re: What would you do

[Stan Halpin]

To my uneducated eye, I would say they are equivalent in performance. 
The 20-35 feels a bit smoother, tighter, better quality. But the 
difference is marginal and I am pleased to use the 16-45 as a 
"standard" lens on the *ist-D.

Stan
(BTW - sorry about the brain cramp lst night that led me to refer to an 
upcoming 12-18mm lens. Obviously I was talking about the 12-24...)

Stan
On Mar 17, 2005, at 10:24 PM, Butch Black wrote:
Hi
Thanks to all that responded. I am going to get the camera without 
lens and will probably add the 16-45 at some later point, although the 
20-35 and the 24/2.0 are not out of the question. How does the 16-45 
compare to the 20-35?

Butch