I have two *istD. I expect them to both reach 50,000 about six years from the purchase date. Paul
> OK, folks, the big question: Given the rate at which you shoot with > your *ist D/DS, how long will it take you to get to 50,000 shutter > firings? > > > Steven Desjardins > Department of Chemistry > Washington and Lee University > Lexington, VA 24450 > (540) 458-8873 > FAX: (540) 458-8878 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/18/05 2:50 PM >>> > >In the end, I think usage returns to normal for most people. > > Noooo - it doesn't! Now I can take all the pictures I always wanted > to! > I take 50-100 shots a day - in average! > It's brilliant! > > Jens Bladt > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt > > > -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- > Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sendt: 18. marts 2005 20:36 > Til: [email protected] > Emne: Re: LIfe Span of a D (was Re: Pulled the trigger) > > > At first I shot a lot more with the *istD than I had done with my film > cameras. Now it's only slightly more. I don't pull the trigger unless > it's a > shot I want. I've gone for walkarounds and not exposed a single frame > -- or > make that a single sensor. In the end, I think usage returns to normal > for > most people. > Paul > > > > The obvious problem (I'm not the first to think of this) is that you > > fire the shutter A LOT MORE with a DSLR than an SLR. If the camera > > wears out based on shutter firings, then 50,000 is not that big > given > > how many pics folks are taking. > > > > > > Steven Desjardins > > Department of Chemistry > > Washington and Lee University > > Lexington, VA 24450 > > (540) 458-8873 > > FAX: (540) 458-8878 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/18/05 1:53 PM >>> > > That site refers to the number of cycles "before the > > electronics and mechanisms...wear out beyond repair." > > I don't think that is correct. The reliability of > > devices such as cameras is usually scored as "mean > > time between failures" (MTBF), without regard for > > whether or not the failure is repairable. > > > > IIRC, most "amateur" and "prosumer" cameras have > > mechanisms rated at 50,000 cycles MTBF; the F-series > > Nikons have been rated 150,000 cycles since at least > > the F3 (maybe before), and the Canon EOS-1 was 100,000 > > cycles (though the 1N went to 150,000). > > > > FWIW anecdotally, my PZ-1 just had its film winding > > mechanism replaced; it broke after 11 years at 50 > > rolls/year = ~20,000 cycles. It shouldn't have done > > that. > > > > Rick > > > > --- Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > FWIW, the EOS 1D is rated at 150,000 shutter cycles. > > > The 1Dm2 and 1Dsm2 > > > are rated at 200,000. EOS-3 was rated at 100,000. > > > > > > BTW, some interesting reading on camera longevity > > > (inc Pentax) here: > > > > > > > > <http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/fototech/help/howlong.html> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Cotty > > > > > > > > > ___/\__ > > > || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche > > > ||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com > > > _____________________________ > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > >
