At first I shot a lot more with the *istD than I had done with my film cameras. 
Now it's only slightly more. I don't pull the trigger unless it's a shot I 
want. I've gone for walkarounds and not exposed a single frame -- or make that 
a single sensor. In the end, I think usage returns to normal for most people.
Paul


> The obvious problem (I'm not the first to think of this) is that you
> fire the shutter A LOT MORE with a DSLR than an SLR.   If the camera
> wears out based on shutter firings, then 50,000 is not that big given
> how many pics folks are taking.
> 
> 
> Steven Desjardins
> Department of Chemistry
> Washington and Lee University
> Lexington, VA 24450
> (540) 458-8873
> FAX: (540) 458-8878
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/18/05 1:53 PM >>>
> That site refers to the number of cycles "before the
> electronics and mechanisms...wear out beyond repair." 
> I don't think that is correct.  The reliability of
> devices such as cameras is usually scored as "mean
> time between failures" (MTBF), without regard for
> whether or not the failure is repairable.
> 
> IIRC, most "amateur" and "prosumer" cameras have
> mechanisms rated at 50,000 cycles MTBF; the F-series
> Nikons have been rated 150,000 cycles since at least
> the F3 (maybe before), and the Canon EOS-1 was 100,000
> cycles (though the 1N went to 150,000).
> 
> FWIW anecdotally, my PZ-1 just had its film winding
> mechanism replaced; it broke after 11 years at 50
> rolls/year = ~20,000 cycles.  It shouldn't have done
> that.
> 
> Rick
> 
> --- Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > FWIW, the EOS 1D is rated at 150,000 shutter cycles.
> > The 1Dm2 and 1Dsm2
> > are rated at 200,000. EOS-3 was rated at 100,000.
> > 
> > BTW, some interesting reading on camera longevity
> > (inc Pentax) here:
> > 
> >
> <http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/fototech/help/howlong.html>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Cheers,
> >   Cotty
> > 
> > 
> > ___/\__
> > ||   (O)   |     People, Places, Pastiche
> > ||=====|    http://www.cottysnaps.com 
> > _____________________________
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> 

Reply via email to