I believe P67 has the backfocus distance ~80mm, which is quite a bit. The FP shutter is tricky though, that's why I thought of a Speed Graphic.
Best, Mishka On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 23:15:52 -0500, Mat Maessen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You'd have to find something with very thin standards. My B&J Orbit > might _just_ be able to get the standards close enough to have the > correct register distance. Once you get that squared away, there's the > issue of a shutter. > If someone's got an old beater Speed Graphic, it might be worth > sacrificing the bed for an experiment. :-) > > -Mat > > On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 20:54:06 -0600, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > P67 seems more promising since it does not have the shade and its > > > coverage should be pretty close to 9cm. i could probably ask > > > s.k.grimes to build a mount for it from a blank board and a short tube. > > > but i would also need to somehow remove the bed from the view. > > > not sure how to do that without butchering the camera. > > > also, i am not sure if the weight of that lens is too much for the > > > front standard. > > > > > > just a thought. > > This would be better approached using a fairly robust view camera. > > Find a dead 6x7 body, and take the lens mount from it. > > Drill a lens board out to fit, screw the body flange to it and Bob's yer > > Uncle. > >
