On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 08:12:24 -0500, Fred <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> I have to disagree.  There was a recent thread here that was started with a
> religious/ethnic joke that one of us (yours truly) thought was
> inappropriate, and said so.  [It wasn't about my ethnic group or my
> religion, but I just think that all religious and/or ethnic jokes should be
> off limits in this sort of a forum, but that's only just my opinion, and
> apparently I'm in the minority on that point.]  It did not become a war
> because I chose not to fuel the ethnic fires with any further reply.
> Instead, the thread went on "peacefully" for days with more jokes and the
> occasional defense of the "appropriateness" of telling ethnic and/or
> religious jokes.  Yes, there was peace, but it was not a "good thing".
> 
> Fred
> 

I must have missed the ethnic joke thread.  

Other than that, It seems to me that we've had a few contentious
discussions that might have ended up in flame wars, but for level
heads.

It may be a time of peace, but it seems to me a rather fragile peace. 
One word in the wrong place might have set things off in an entirely
different direction.

OTOH, maybe it's a good thing that pototentially dangerous situations
seem to be handled in a mature way.  Maybe we're growing <LOL>.

cheers,
frnak


-- 
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept."  -Henri Cartier-Bresson

Reply via email to