I've always thought the tubular viewfinder shape an
uncomplimentary design feature. Can't say why. Maybe
it's the "peek-a-boo" squint inducing suggestion of
it.
It does allow more display and control area which, I
imagine, is the idea.
I'd like to see design "D".

Jack

--- P�l Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some thoughts of the design of the mock-ups:
> 
> Design A:
> Too angular, somewhat retro early 80's look; a bit
> like the Canon T70. The placement of the thumb wheel
> seem awkward compared to the other designs. Prism a
> bit too square; it would have looked better with the
> prism design of the 645N(II). 
> The "face" of the prism too tall and the round
> shapes around the lens mount at odds with the
> overall angular design.
> 
> Design B:
> Ergonomically the most interesting design obviously
> inspired by the MZ-S. Unfortunately the grooves by
> the sides of the prism look awful and the face of
> the prism and the name tag look silly. 
> 
> 
> Design C:
> Very close to A except prism design. The rounded
> profile along the sides of the prism again look at
> odds with the angular design. The face of the prism
> rather boring and lack character. Overhang
> unnecessary. 
> 
> 
> SOLUTION:
> 
> The prism design of C would look better on A minus
> the overhang. However, a real solution would be a
> modification of design B: Keep the slanted top panel
> (excellent for viewing when using the camera on a
> tripod). Lower the height of the grip somewhat. 
> Instead of a groove that goes from to the grip
> through the prism, make it straight and slanted like
> on the MZ-S. Also, design the prism modelled after
> the MZ-S but minus that cameras overhang -
> unnecessary because the 645 has no built in flash
> and the larger size will give the right propotions
> anyway. This solution could  possibly interfer with
> the three buttons on the left shoulder of the
> camera, but these might be put on the back of the
> camera where there should be lots of room or,
> alternatively, they could make a "shelf" for then by
> the side of the prism. 
> Such a camera outlined above would have lots of
> character and also be very ergonomic. All of course
> in my opinion...
> 
> BTW  The design of the camera can be found here:
> 
>
http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00BVWU
> 
> 
> P�l
> 
> 
> 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Reply via email to