Nope, divide by 4. Those postage stamp size negative users have to throw away a 1/4 inch of their negative to print on standard size paper, and those digi-weenies don't even have a negative to throw away (grin). It is a 32-127 zoom equivalent. BTW, I just aquired four new (well two new, and two old) fedoras to go with my Graphic. Now what other camera enables you to buy a new hat. Now that is real enablement!
graywolf http://www.graywolfphoto.com "Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof" -----------------------------------
William Robb wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "Mishka" Subject: Re: Future of DA lenses
hate to disappoint you, but no.
just a 4x5. but a very, really, awfully nice one -- a pacemaker speed graphic.
just ran a few test shots with its stock 127 (eh... 35? i can't see my new math
calculator at the moment) ektar and provia 100 -- what a treat! now
all i need is
a rain-free weekend.
i guess i am a sucker to small cameras with tiny negs (... compared to 11x14 or
even 5x7)
I think divide by 3, more or less. Your 127 is really a 43!!!!!!!
William Robb
-- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.0 - Release Date: 3/31/2005
