On Apr 1, 2005 10:37 AM, Ann Sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, once again I didn't get the original mail of
> Frank's :(
> 
> also, I seem not to have gotten the mail where I
> corrected
> manakin to mannequin (manakin is a bird, it
> appears, not a varient
> spelling of the other.)
> 
> Frank, you just THINK you didn't notice her
> crossed legs and those
> of the mannequin...
> somewhere in the dark recesses of your so-called
> mind - I bet ya did :)
> 
> Nice shot!
> 

Thanks, Ann.

Well, what I tell this list (that is:  The Truth), and what I tell the
rest of the world (those looking at my portfolio, or the odd show I
may have - only one month 'til my next one! <g>), are two different
things.

I can tell you without any hesitation, that I didn't notice the
mannequins.  I noticed the girl (sorry, young lady).  She was standing
there, but no matter where she was standing, I'd have shot.  Had she
been standing next to a pile of doggie doo, that would have been in
the pic.  <LOL>

Of course, were you a famous critic (not that I'd know a famous
critic) looking at that up on a wall, I'd tell you that I saw the
whole thing when I shot...  <vbg>

thanks again,
frank



-- 
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept."  -Henri Cartier-Bresson

Reply via email to