I find the quality Ok,if not up to the standard of my Pentax lenses (of course!)- Ryan has also used it and found it satisfactory, I think.
HTH
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2005 11:45 AM
Subject: RE: Sigma 18-35/3.5-4.5 MF query
-----Original Message----- From: John Coyle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peter, I use the AF version of this lens on the MZ-S and haven't noticed any problems with it.
Thanks John. Maybe I should take the MX into the shop and shoot some pics with it and see for myself. Although no-one has claimed the lens as a paragon of iamging virtue, no-one has condemned it either. For the versatility it seems to offer it might be a good buy. It is new and priced the same as a secondhand Tamron 24/2.5 (later version with large front element) and a bit more than the earlier version of the same Tamron.
I really just wanted a 24/2.8 of decent quality, but they seem quite thin on the ground in K mount.
-- Peter Williams

