Very interesting, Boris. Yes, it seems the M 3.5/28mm lens is doing better wide open, but the DA is doing a lot better stopped down.
Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Boris Liberman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 3. april 2005 06:41 Til: [email protected] Emne: Re: 16-45/4 and M 28/3.5 Tests on Res Chart Hi! > Full chart at 100% and wide open: > http://www.donsauction.com/pdml/28vsDA/FullChart.htm > > Full chart at 100% and F8: > http://www.donsauction.com/pdml/28vsDA/FullChart_F8.htm > > Center of chart at 300%, wide open and at F8: > http://www.donsauction.com/pdml/28vsDA/300Percent.htm > > Shot from about 4 feet, I was not trying for actual resolution, > just a comparison. > The DA seems best at F8, where it does better than the 28. > Wide open I'll take the 28 any day, it likes it there. Don, et al, how come 28/3.5 is sharper wide open than at f/8 where it should be (close to or) at its sweet spot? Please unconfuse me. Thanks. Boris
