Thanks Shel! Don
BTW: The Super Program lived! ;-) > -----Original Message----- > From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 8:26 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: SMCP 135/2.5 comments? > > > Don. > I've had a couple - three of those lenses, and used an A*135/1.8 a few > times. The K135/2.5 is a great lens by comparison, especially for the > money. The size is quite a bit more handy as well. IMO, especially when > shooting hand held, the K135 is comparable to the A*135/1.8 > unless you must > have the wider aperture. Putting them on a tripod, critically focusing, > using appropriate shutter speeds and film that can "see" the differences > between the lenses, and making large enough prints in which you can see > what the film sees, then by all means the A*135 is the better lens - but > not 5x to 8x better, which is about how much more the A* will > cost over the > K135. > > Shel > > > > [Original Message] > > From: Don Sanderson > > > I've heard this lens called the "Poor Mans 135/1.8". > > Anyone have any experience with it? > > > > TIA > > Don > >
