Godfrey wrote:
Why not go for a 20x24" banquet camera and be done with it? ]'-)
1. My back? 2. My wallet?
Kidding aside, for me 645 netted the maximum benefit for the minimum equipment size increase over 35mm. I tend to prefer 6x6 for convenience (never have to turn the camera on its side for a vertical) but the 6x4.5cm format gives the greatest benefit with the least wastage of film area for the normal rectangular format prints, and is certainly big enough for any prints I've ever been interested to make.
I guess that's why they make 645's then? :)
Tom C.
