That's my general view as well. What I like(d) about transparencies, is
that I felt, at least, that I had a tangible viewable standard. The slide
was the slide, and if I really liked it, the point was to get the print or
digitized version to match as closely as possible to the slide, in tone and
color.
With digital, I don't have that.
Tom C.
From: Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Taking, Making, Creating Images
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 07:46:46 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
To me the point is that the transparency is the first (and for me the last)
generation of the image as I saw it & captured it, whereas the print &
digital RAW are starting points.
The calibration issue is a given with all processes.
Kenneth Waller
