You're right about the M50 1.7 Shel, it was the replacement for the [K]55 1.8. I'm not sure that the M50 1.4 would be called a major redesign, (except for the mechanics that is),
but all of the tooling had to be changed which along with improvements in coatings may account for
some difference in results.


Shel Belinkoff wrote:

Hi Godfrey,

I doubt it.  The M series was a major redesign from the K, and the look I
get from the K50/1.4 and the M50/1.4 is different.

As far as I can recall,, there was never a K50/1.7, so your comment doesn't
seem right on that point, either.

Shel




[Original Message]
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi





the M and K should be identical optically, the A, F and FA versions identical optically. I've never owned any other Pentax 50/1.4 so I can't compare.

The f/1.7 versions are supposed to be the same, optically, from the K through the FA. I know the A and F versions render identically.









--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war. During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings and shoot foreigners - two things that are usually frowned on during peacetime.
--P.J. O'Rourke





Reply via email to