On 21 Apr 2005 at 22:56, Paul Stenquist wrote: > True enough. But how many tests have you seen where the results were > identical? An APS sensor is obviously not the limiting factor. Hell, I > can see that just in print quality at 13 x 19. Another thngI see is a > lot of anger here and in other places. Some are angry because the film > processing biz is in the toilet. Others are angry because Pentax didn't > build the camera they wanted. So the equipment which they praised just > a couple of months ago is no longer good enough to get optimum results > from coke bottle lenses. It's a mix of sour grapes and solid bullshit.
We aren't allowed to be angry? I'd be angry if I'd just bought a Rover too (but not entirely surprised). Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
