Thanks for the second chance, Frank!

It took a lot of work in PSE to make the jpg look
anything like the slide.  It still falls short in the
foreground and the color in the clouds.

I may send this one out for a print...good idea!

Rick

--- frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/22/05, Rick Womer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is The Folly in Faringdon, Oxfordshire, UK on
> a
> > beautiful June evening.  It is a 100-foot hilltop
> > tower that was built in 1935 by a local worthy, to
> > provide employment to local craftsmen.  It was
> > restored several years ago and is occasionally
> open,
> > but I've never been inside.
> > 
> >
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3302383
> > 
> > Z-1p, FA 24-90, Kodak Elite 100; scanned, resized,
> > contrast adjusted, and sharpened.
> 
> I looked at this last night, and to be honest,
> didn't think too much
> of it.  Not that I thought it a bad shot or
> anything;  it just made me
> shrug my shoulders and think "doesn't grab me".
> 
> I came back this morning, and upon a second viewing
> I'm coming to
> appreciate it more.  I noticed that it's not
> vertical - which actually
> looks good here.  I also looked at the trees and the
> long grass, and
> noticed that it seems their moving.  Was it windy
> that day?  That
> motion blur gives the photo a whole different
> dynamic.
> 
> Still not sure if I like the bright tower/dark
> foreground thing, but I
> think it might work much better on a big print. 
> This is likely one of
> those that suffers in the transition to computer
> screen.
> 
> I'm glad I decided to give this one a second chance.
>  Good shot!
> 
> cheers,
> frank
> 
> 
> -- 
> "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept."  -Henri
> Cartier-Bresson
> 
> 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Reply via email to